<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Church of Liars?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bligbi.com/2009/04/13/the-church-of-liars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bligbi.com/2009/04/13/the-church-of-liars/</link>
	<description>The ramblings of a non-apologetic militant atheist mom doing time in the lonestar state on atheism, religion, feminism, politics and current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EvilGod</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2009/04/13/the-church-of-liars/comment-page-1/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/?p=2369#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>I like the fact you titled this article with perhaps the most rhetorical question ever asked. Is there any other sort of church?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the fact you titled this article with perhaps the most rhetorical question ever asked. Is there any other sort of church?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PsiCop</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2009/04/13/the-church-of-liars/comment-page-1/#comment-2164</link>
		<dc:creator>PsiCop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/?p=2369#comment-2164</guid>
		<description>Warren&#039;s aide also claimed in an email reported by Politico, that &quot;for 5,000 years, EVERY culture and EVERY religion has maintained&quot; that marriage is solely to be between one man and one woman.

This is an interesting claim, given that there are religions, e.g. Islam, that even now accept polygamy, and many countries in which it is legal. Moreover, even the Biblical patriarchs were said to have had multiple wives, and some kings of Israel not only had multiple wives, but also concubines. And they all supposedly lived less than 5,000 years ago.

Time for the verifiably untrue statements spewing regularly from Warren and/or his advisors to stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren&#8217;s aide also claimed in an email reported by Politico, that &#8220;for 5,000 years, EVERY culture and EVERY religion has maintained&#8221; that marriage is solely to be between one man and one woman.</p>
<p>This is an interesting claim, given that there are religions, e.g. Islam, that even now accept polygamy, and many countries in which it is legal. Moreover, even the Biblical patriarchs were said to have had multiple wives, and some kings of Israel not only had multiple wives, but also concubines. And they all supposedly lived less than 5,000 years ago.</p>
<p>Time for the verifiably untrue statements spewing regularly from Warren and/or his advisors to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B..T.Peri</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2009/04/13/the-church-of-liars/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>B..T.Peri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/?p=2369#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>Many of us understood exactly what Rick Warren was saying in the comments you have posted, and do not interpret the remarks in the same way that you have done here.  

I suppose we hear what we want, but the fact is that Rick did not partake in the campaign for Proposition 8, and did not contribute to it financially.  He also did not appear on any of the committee&#039;s endorsement lists.  

What he said is he believed that marriage is between a man and a woman, and he shared that with his congregation.   Yes, he did believe Prop 8, in its exact statement, is correct, and he supports the definition of marriage being between a man and woman.  That is one viewpoint, and as a pastor he has a right to share tha with his congregation.  However, that is vastly different then actively being a part of the campaign.

Finally, many of us knew he was simply giving 3 examples of what he did not consider a marriage.  All three were actually in the news cycle at the time.  That does not make them equal, or related.  Most of us saw the point !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us understood exactly what Rick Warren was saying in the comments you have posted, and do not interpret the remarks in the same way that you have done here.  </p>
<p>I suppose we hear what we want, but the fact is that Rick did not partake in the campaign for Proposition 8, and did not contribute to it financially.  He also did not appear on any of the committee&#8217;s endorsement lists.  </p>
<p>What he said is he believed that marriage is between a man and a woman, and he shared that with his congregation.   Yes, he did believe Prop 8, in its exact statement, is correct, and he supports the definition of marriage being between a man and woman.  That is one viewpoint, and as a pastor he has a right to share tha with his congregation.  However, that is vastly different then actively being a part of the campaign.</p>
<p>Finally, many of us knew he was simply giving 3 examples of what he did not consider a marriage.  All three were actually in the news cycle at the time.  That does not make them equal, or related.  Most of us saw the point !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.345 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-12-31 07:28:16 -->
