Comments on: In case you thought women were human http://bligbi.com/2008/04/28/in-case-you-thought-women-were-human/ The ramblings of a non-apologetic militant atheist mom doing time in the lonestar state on atheism, religion, feminism, politics and current events. Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:46:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: HereticChick http://bligbi.com/2008/04/28/in-case-you-thought-women-were-human/#comment-3336 HereticChick Fri, 16 May 2008 21:58:04 +0000 http://bligbi.com/?p=1026#comment-3336 These people make me sick. I had no idea my vagina and uterus are property of the US Gov't. Made me so mad, I wanted to GET an abortion! And I can't even get pregnant! Sheesh! These people make me sick. I had no idea my vagina and uterus are property of the US Gov’t. Made me so mad, I wanted to GET an abortion! And I can’t even get pregnant! Sheesh!

]]> By: What The Atheists Are Saying, Pt. 2 « Without Politicians http://bligbi.com/2008/04/28/in-case-you-thought-women-were-human/#comment-3300 What The Atheists Are Saying, Pt. 2 « Without Politicians Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:28:44 +0000 http://bligbi.com/?p=1026#comment-3300 [...] feminism, hardcore, Homosexuality, life, pandas in hell, Random, thoughts, women trackback In Case You Thought Women Were Human No, It Was Just Natural Selection Where Did Jesus Go? Faced My Mortality, Still An Atheist [...] [...] feminism, hardcore, Homosexuality, life, pandas in hell, Random, thoughts, women trackback In Case You Thought Women Were Human No, It Was Just Natural Selection Where Did Jesus Go? Faced My Mortality, Still An Atheist [...]

]]> By: KC http://bligbi.com/2008/04/28/in-case-you-thought-women-were-human/#comment-3299 KC Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:23:27 +0000 http://bligbi.com/?p=1026#comment-3299 Even if we accept the argument that the fetus is a person <a href="http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=library&page=emcdonagh_26_4" rel="nofollow">it's rights are still restricted</a> by the rights of born persons. As no born person has access rights to another person's body <i>neither does the unborn person</i>. Even if we accept the argument that the fetus is a person it’s rights are still restricted by the rights of born persons. As no born person has access rights to another person’s body neither does the unborn person.

]]> By: Doris Tracey http://bligbi.com/2008/04/28/in-case-you-thought-women-were-human/#comment-3297 Doris Tracey Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:06:46 +0000 http://bligbi.com/?p=1026#comment-3297 The baby as a separate entity has the right to life, liberty and the persuit of happiness. These babies have been crying in the wilderness too long and finally someone is hearing them. A nation must pay for the murder of the innocent.We will suffer economically and many other ways. Our undertakings are no longer smiled upon. Mans hearts have been turned to stone because of this crime. A real mother would die for her child and sacrifice her own life. We must wake up or pereish. The baby as a separate entity has the right to life, liberty and the persuit of happiness. These babies have been crying in the wilderness too long and finally someone is hearing them. A nation must pay for the murder of the innocent.We will suffer economically and many other ways. Our undertakings are no longer smiled upon. Mans hearts have been turned to stone because of this crime. A real mother would die for her child and sacrifice her own life. We must wake up or pereish.

]]> By: Chicken Girl http://bligbi.com/2008/04/28/in-case-you-thought-women-were-human/#comment-3296 Chicken Girl Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:43:50 +0000 http://bligbi.com/?p=1026#comment-3296 To be fair, you do need to get an ultrasound before having an abortion so that the doctor can assess how far along you are, and in early pregnancy doing it vaginally is the best way to get a clear picture. But this law doesn't have anything to do with that, it's to satisfy their personal fetus fetish by making the pregnant hoor look at the baybee she's about to kill. What I'm now curious about is... does this mean baybee-murderin' hoors have to get <em>two</em> ultrasounds? One to assess the pregnancy, and one to let her know what a baybee-murderin' hoor she is? To be fair, you do need to get an ultrasound before having an abortion so that the doctor can assess how far along you are, and in early pregnancy doing it vaginally is the best way to get a clear picture. But this law doesn’t have anything to do with that, it’s to satisfy their personal fetus fetish by making the pregnant hoor look at the baybee she’s about to kill.

What I’m now curious about is… does this mean baybee-murderin’ hoors have to get two ultrasounds? One to assess the pregnancy, and one to let her know what a baybee-murderin’ hoor she is?

]]>