The New York Times recently ran with a title about how women’s support for Clinton had surged due to “percieved” sexism as compared to the real thing. What this means in the real world is that we vagina bearers are making shit up cuz that’s what having a vagina does to a person. We vagina bearers are just not capable of understanding that absolute bullshit being said about a woman that would largely never be said about a man is hard hitting commentary not sexist digs about women’s inherent inferiority to men.
Case in point: Hillary Clinton shown crying because one of the big meanies of the world, in this case Osama Bin Laden, said something about her clothes:
Yep. No sexism there. Pointing out that we vagina bearers are prone to hysterics at the slightest criticism and are thus incapable with dealing with “real problems” is just stating the facts. Seeing anything else but that is obviously a sign that a PMS meltdown is imminent.
{ 3 comments }
I don’t find the political cartoon funny nor relevant. If she can handle Bill, she can handle these supposedly world trouble makers.
During the Clinton Presidency, Hillary was demonized primarily for being too smart, assertive, and willing to speak her mind. At the time, many speculated that she was really running the country and Bill was just her puppet. If this is even a little true, it suggests that she is more than qualified for the Presidency. I cannot help but wonder if those who criticized her on these grounds before now feel stuck because they are trying to have it both ways and failing miserably.
BTW, I do not support Hillary as the Democratic nominee, but my reasons have nothing to do with either her sex or her competence. I see her as the most right-leaning of the Democratic candidates, and I want someone more progressive. Having said that, I would vote for her over any of the Republican nominees.
You’re right, there’s no sexism. We should git back in the kitchen and make Osama a sandwich. Sigh.
Comments on this entry are closed.