<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the Bible be spared from flames and poo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/</link>
	<description>The ramblings of a non-apologetic militant atheist mom doing time in the lonestar state on atheism, religion, feminism, politics and current events.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harris: Speaking Truth to Power &#187; Bligbi</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harris: Speaking Truth to Power &#187; Bligbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-578</guid>
		<description>[...] the &#8220;Mills Incident&#8221; as an example. He ripped out a page of the Bible and used it to pick up dog poo. Another [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the &#8220;Mills Incident&#8221; as an example. He ripped out a page of the Bible and used it to pick up dog poo. Another [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saint Gasoline</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Saint Gasoline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-461</guid>
		<description>I agree completely with everything you've said here.  What Mills has done is essentially no different a statement than burning a flag.  I wrote an entry about this on my website today and pretty much side with you against people like Ed Brayton and The Friendly Atheist, although I respect those two bloggers immensely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely with everything you&#8217;ve said here.  What Mills has done is essentially no different a statement than burning a flag.  I wrote an entry about this on my website today and pretty much side with you against people like Ed Brayton and The Friendly Atheist, although I respect those two bloggers immensely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Some of the dispute has taken quite a personal bent if my email's any indication and that was what I was cautioning against (you said something about calling people "Uncle Jeez") more than anything.  

I call it bullshit because the reaction is completely out of touch with reality.   These fascists destroy lives and kill people, but never is there a greater outrage  than when an impolite atheist goes and makes one of them cry.

I'm willing to bet that more Christians have been upset by the Blasphemy Challenge than those upset about &lt;a href="http://www.dallasobserver.com/blogs/?p=2461" rel="nofollow"&gt; the beatings and rapes that took place under one of their roofs&lt;/a&gt;. 

It's just absurd, you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the dispute has taken quite a personal bent if my email&#8217;s any indication and that was what I was cautioning against (you said something about calling people &#8220;Uncle Jeez&#8221;) more than anything.  </p>
<p>I call it bullshit because the reaction is completely out of touch with reality.   These fascists destroy lives and kill people, but never is there a greater outrage  than when an impolite atheist goes and makes one of them cry.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m willing to bet that more Christians have been upset by the Blasphemy Challenge than those upset about <a href="http://www.dallasobserver.com/blogs/?p=2461" rel="nofollow"> the beatings and rapes that took place under one of their roofs</a>. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just absurd, you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Exterminator</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>The Exterminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>K.C.:

Yeah, I agree with you that the whole dispute is bullshit. Mills, a wonderful self-promoter, pulled off a great publicity stunt, and some in our community (you and I included) bit. 

I don't think, though, that atheists need to guard against attacking one another. There's no reason why we must speak in a unified voice, since we're not following any set of commands from on high. I get outraged when an atheist worries about how our words and actions look to the people who have been using political systems for thousands of years to ram their supernaturalism down our throats. 

I'm not a friendly atheist. Any friendliness I manifest is completely unrelated to my atheism. I'm not interested in being charming in the hopes that my personality will help me spread the non-gospel. I don't care what my neighbors believe. In fact, my atheism would be an entirely private matter were it not threatened every day by governmental intrusion. Under the Nazis, a smiling Jew was treated no differently than an angry one. Friendliness didn't end slavery; it didn't give women the vote; it didn't end segregation; it didn't work against Joe McCarthy and HUAC. And it won't end the attempts by the world's godpushers to pick my pockets, wash my brain, and bomb my cities.

With that rant -- giving me the space for which I thank you -- I end my comments in the super-pooper-scooper debate. I will now return to my regularly scheduled deprogramming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K.C.:</p>
<p>Yeah, I agree with you that the whole dispute is bullshit. Mills, a wonderful self-promoter, pulled off a great publicity stunt, and some in our community (you and I included) bit. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think, though, that atheists need to guard against attacking one another. There&#8217;s no reason why we must speak in a unified voice, since we&#8217;re not following any set of commands from on high. I get outraged when an atheist worries about how our words and actions look to the people who have been using political systems for thousands of years to ram their supernaturalism down our throats. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a friendly atheist. Any friendliness I manifest is completely unrelated to my atheism. I&#8217;m not interested in being charming in the hopes that my personality will help me spread the non-gospel. I don&#8217;t care what my neighbors believe. In fact, my atheism would be an entirely private matter were it not threatened every day by governmental intrusion. Under the Nazis, a smiling Jew was treated no differently than an angry one. Friendliness didn&#8217;t end slavery; it didn&#8217;t give women the vote; it didn&#8217;t end segregation; it didn&#8217;t work against Joe McCarthy and HUAC. And it won&#8217;t end the attempts by the world&#8217;s godpushers to pick my pockets, wash my brain, and bomb my cities.</p>
<p>With that rant &#8212; giving me the space for which I thank you &#8212; I end my comments in the super-pooper-scooper debate. I will now return to my regularly scheduled deprogramming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Exterminator,

Sorry about the problems posting.  I think it was something about that theme as it's been a pain in the backside from the get go. I'm going to have to do some tinkering with it before putting it back up.

As to the dispute, I think it's bullshit.   Of course, I think anything that gets Frank Walton's seal of approval is bullshit, but I'm a bit biased against &lt;a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/08/why-do-some-people-hate-frank-walton.html" rel="nofollow"&gt; that little shit&lt;/a&gt;. 

I'd caution against slamming Hemant and other atheists who share his opinion though.  It's something they (theists) have done for a long time - getting us to fight each other over dumb shit like this video or the title of Richard Dawkins book  (OMG!!!  He put DELUSION right there in the title!  Mean Atheist!  Mean!  All you &lt;i&gt;nice&lt;/i&gt; atheists better clutch some pearls or I'm going to cry!  Cry, I say! )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exterminator,</p>
<p>Sorry about the problems posting.  I think it was something about that theme as it&#8217;s been a pain in the backside from the get go. I&#8217;m going to have to do some tinkering with it before putting it back up.</p>
<p>As to the dispute, I think it&#8217;s bullshit.   Of course, I think anything that gets Frank Walton&#8217;s seal of approval is bullshit, but I&#8217;m a bit biased against <a href="http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/08/why-do-some-people-hate-frank-walton.html" rel="nofollow"> that little shit</a>. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d caution against slamming Hemant and other atheists who share his opinion though.  It&#8217;s something they (theists) have done for a long time - getting us to fight each other over dumb shit like this video or the title of Richard Dawkins book  (OMG!!!  He put DELUSION right there in the title!  Mean Atheist!  Mean!  All you <i>nice</i> atheists better clutch some pearls or I&#8217;m going to cry!  Cry, I say! )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Exterminator</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>The Exterminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 04:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>K.C.:

Hemant, the Friendly Atheist, has joined the fray, criticizing this post. Since I agree with just about everything you say here, I left him a reply, which I've copied here for your enjoyment.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Cut the not-holier than thou stuff, Hemant. David Mills was having some good clean-up fun. 

By the way, I'm not convinced that was a little girl's laughter in the background. What evidence do you have to jump to that conclusion. Maybe it was a girlish adult? 

Anyway, why must all atheists act as a friendly bloc?  Some of us find the ideas in the bible offensive. If Mills had cleaned up shit with a copy of &lt;em&gt;Mein Kampf&lt;/em&gt;, would that be OK? Or would you be afraid that we'd offend some Nazis?

I don't see any reason why we need to look for acceptance from the godiots. That's not to say that we have to go out of our way to be insulting. But, please, let's not act offended if one of us states his or her case using strong language, verbal or symbolic. All our discourse doesn't have to be &lt;em&gt;effective&lt;/em&gt; in terms of getting "our message" across.  Some of us don't even have a message; we just want the godpushers to keep their voodoo out of public affairs. Sometimes, it's just fun -- or necessary -- to blow off steam. Being nice may get you invited to parties, but it won't convince any supernaturalists that their sky buddy makes no sense.

So as of now, I'm going to start using a new term: an Uncle Jeez. That's an atheist who kowtows to the religious. 

Don't be one.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K.C.:</p>
<p>Hemant, the Friendly Atheist, has joined the fray, criticizing this post. Since I agree with just about everything you say here, I left him a reply, which I&#8217;ve copied here for your enjoyment.</p>
<blockquote><p>Cut the not-holier than thou stuff, Hemant. David Mills was having some good clean-up fun. </p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;m not convinced that was a little girl&#8217;s laughter in the background. What evidence do you have to jump to that conclusion. Maybe it was a girlish adult? </p>
<p>Anyway, why must all atheists act as a friendly bloc?  Some of us find the ideas in the bible offensive. If Mills had cleaned up shit with a copy of <em>Mein Kampf</em>, would that be OK? Or would you be afraid that we&#8217;d offend some Nazis?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any reason why we need to look for acceptance from the godiots. That&#8217;s not to say that we have to go out of our way to be insulting. But, please, let&#8217;s not act offended if one of us states his or her case using strong language, verbal or symbolic. All our discourse doesn&#8217;t have to be <em>effective</em> in terms of getting &#8220;our message&#8221; across.  Some of us don&#8217;t even have a message; we just want the godpushers to keep their voodoo out of public affairs. Sometimes, it&#8217;s just fun &#8212; or necessary &#8212; to blow off steam. Being nice may get you invited to parties, but it won&#8217;t convince any supernaturalists that their sky buddy makes no sense.</p>
<p>So as of now, I&#8217;m going to start using a new term: an Uncle Jeez. That&#8217;s an atheist who kowtows to the religious. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be one.</p></blockquote>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friendly Atheist &#187; How Not To Blaspheme</title>
		<link>http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Friendly Atheist &#187; How Not To Blaspheme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bligbi.com/2007/03/01/should-the-bible-be-spared-from-flames-and-poo/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>[...] Bligbi, however, is defending Mills and videos similar to his:  Burning, destroying and otherwise Ã¢â‚¬Å“disrespectingÃ¢â‚¬Â a symbol is a longtime tool of rebellion. People burn flags. They blow up statues. They destroy all manner of things from the mythological Ã¢â‚¬Å“bra burningÃ¢â‚¬Â of the sixties to the burning of effigies of despised political leaders today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bligbi, however, is defending Mills and videos similar to his:  Burning, destroying and otherwise Ã¢â‚¬Å“disrespectingÃ¢â‚¬Â a symbol is a longtime tool of rebellion. People burn flags. They blow up statues. They destroy all manner of things from the mythological Ã¢â‚¬Å“bra burningÃ¢â‚¬Â of the sixties to the burning of effigies of despised political leaders today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
