2. No. Planned Parenthood has put up a fight against anti-choice demands that women be forced to have sonograms before an abortion is performed and other tactics that are clearly aimed at not at helping the woman, but in stopping abortions.

Seriously. Consider a friend of mine who had a pregancy terminated in the third trimester. I forget the exact name of the problem, but he, the fetus, was severely malformed, would’ve lived a short life of a pain should he have survived birth which would’ve possibly killed my friend also. Why should she have been forced to have a sonogram?

Because anti-choicers hope that such women will see the heart beating and make an entirely emotional decision and not the “informed” one they bray about.

3. Yes it is. The evidence is, at best, inconclusive. If you tell someone they’re going to catch a disease that has no cure if they do XXX - without evidence that such an assertion is true and even contrary to the conclusions of that disease’s researchers- you are engaging in a scare tactic.

4. There’s a big difference between being informed and misinformed. Telling people that mixing pain-killers and alcohol can lead to death is informing them. Tell them that mixing pain-killers and iced tea will lead to death is misinforming them. There’s support for the first situation. There’s no support for the second situation - which is where the whole abortion-equals-breast cancer falls under.

5. I’d like to see some evidence supporting this assertion in regards to Rep. Waxman. As far as I can tell, he has never voted yes on any legislation put through by anti-choicers . He voted against making it a crime to transport minors across state lines. He voted against tieing foreign aid to pro-birth policies. He is the one behind the above report exposing CPCs for the liars that they are. I’d say that falls under being “pro-woman”.

2)Planned Parenthood has an even worse record of misinforming women, preventing them from having sonograms, promoting their profit making abortion mills.

3)Telling a woman there is a “possibility” of increased risk of breast cancer” is not a scare tactic. Valid studies have shown and the physical nature of breast cell transformation during pregnancy support the “possibility”.

4) Have you looked at the inserts in any drug you take nowadays? You may get cancer, heart disease or die, but people still take the drug. The difference is that they are informed consumers.

5)This “study” is just political manipulation by Waxman. He doesn’t care about women. I hope you do!