An experiment with Coke & Mentos
Check out this video of two men recreating the Bellagio Fountains with Mentos-enhanced Diet Coke.
Don’t you wish you had that much time on your hands?
Check out this video of two men recreating the Bellagio Fountains with Mentos-enhanced Diet Coke.
Don’t you wish you had that much time on your hands?
I have had it with the Democrats. Governor Blanco of Lousiana has signed the abortion ban bill and that is the last straw for me. The Democrats are supposed to be about representing the little guy – folks like me and my family. Instead we get bitches and bastards like Blanco:
“Today, I signed into law Senate Bill No. 33 by Senator Ben Nevers of Bogalusa. This bill, passed by an overwelming majority of the Legislature, would prohibit abortion in Louisiana, except when necessary to save the life of the mother.
This measure takes effect in Lousiana if the US Supreme Court overturns Roe v Wade, in whole or in part, or if the US Constitution is amended allowing states to prohibit abortions.
I along with many other pro-life legislatures, had hoped this bill would include special protections for women in cases of rape and incest. In the end, these exceptions did not pass, but the central provision of the bill supports and reflects my personal beliefs”
Now, I can’t bring myself to vote for a Republican – but I will not vote for another Democrat until that damn party straightens it’s ass out and makes something besides getting elected a priority.
And to any diehard supporter – bite my ass. The democratic party is a disgrace. It stands for nothing. Absolutely nothing. It has backed down on civil rights for non-whites, it gives lip service to the rights of homosexuals and it has completely abandoned any pretense of supporting the rights of women.
It fucking sucks and it will not get a single penny or vote from me from this day forward.
Blogged with Flock
The House Judicial Commitee is considering HR-2679 aka the Public Expression of Religion Act (PERA). If this bill becomes law it will effectively limit access to the courts in cases involving the Establishment Clause as it will strip plaintiffs of the right to seek attorney fees and costs in successful challenges.
Without this right officials will have no true obstacle to imposing their religious beliefs on the general public.
If this bill passes, the only penalty for violations of the Establishment Clause will be the court’s injunction to end that particular unconstitutional practice. Appointed and elected officials will simply modify their practices just enough to circumvent the court’s ruling, knowing that they will face no penalty for their actions and that eventually the plaintiff will be unable to afford to pursue additional cases through the court system. Clearly, the only purpose of PERA is to deny Americans access to the courts to protect their constitutional rights. Passing this type of legislation virtually guarantees that plaintiffs will be unable to afford to seek redress against unconstitutional government action. This would make the freedoms guaranteed in our Constitution worthless, which will encourage a tyranny of the majority and relegate the nonreligious to a state of second-class citizenship.
The Secular Coalition has a sample letter to get you started on urging the HJC to vote No on this bill. The members are:
You can look up your representative here.
***Note: The thrust of this article has been revoked in light of Raving Atheist’s response on this thread, Honour Amongst Atheists and an apology issued to RA for what turned out to be baseless accusations.
Today, I find this post at Goosing the Antithesis. Earlier this month the Raving Atheist offered Atheist Mommy $20 an hour to volunteer in an CPC. My suspicion was confirmed as far as I’m concerned — the Raving Atheist is bad news.
But some good has come of it. I realized I had a bias that I’m going to need to work on. When I was sitting up my (now defunct) about page, I worried about mentioning my children and what theists would do with that information.
It never occurred to me to think about what a fellow atheist might do with it. I automatically assumed that other atheists would be rational and honest and not target my children and/or me as a mother.
In short, a zealot is a zealot no matter what side of the theological line they choose.a
It seems I’vgone and disturbed someone with my post about not allowing Christianity to be taught to my child wherein I stated that the universe doesn’t care about our existence and that dead is dead and in retaliation got this:
Personally, I think it is arrogant to think that WE (human beings) are the “be all, end all” of the whole damn thing.
But, believing that we humans a single species amongst millions (billions?) of species are somehow exempt from death is not arrogant? I think that’s the height of arrogance.
Let me put it this way. I spent the morning sweeping up dead worms that fled the soggy grounds for my carport sometime in the night. Where did their little worm souls go? Heaven? Hell? Reincarnated as worms somewhere where the ground isn’t a soggy mess?
All religions and their related quasi-religions teach that humans are extra special. Provided we accept The Truth (TM) , death is something we are singularly exempt from.
Both sets of my grandparents, my mother, my dad, Mr & Mrs. J., Mr. Joe, my eldest brother, my childhood friend, my uncle Kenny, my father-in-law, Mr. Jeff and so many others are just like those worms I swept up this morning. They are dead.
That’s not arrogance. That’s reality. And one day I am going to be dead also. But, before then I know I’m going to be attending the funeral services for two of my siblings. They have the same fatal heart disease that killed our mother when she wasn’t much older than I am now. Understanding that there is no objective evidence of humans cheating death puts a new perspective on life.
As children we were taught to compete against each other. As adults (and atheists) looking death in the eyeballs, we’ve put those old grudges aside and moved within a few miles of each other. The sole holdout is the theist. He thinks we’re all going to meet somewhere out there one day. I doubt it and I hope he’s dead before he figures that out.
Why? I’ve met former theists who carry a mind-numbing pain at having put off connecting with friends and family because of an ardent belief in the “next” life. I wouldn’t wish that on a lowly worm.
I have to say that Atheism strikes me as a lonely road to go down. Not lonely in the sense of no human connection, lonely in that there are some things that move your soul, that spiritually excite you, and that part is a big chunk of what makes us human in the most decent sense of the word. If you believe that we are alone in this, that there is nothing beyond what we are now, and we are all just here doing what we do until we don’t do it anymore – that’s a little sad and lonely.
Disagreement is one thing calling me “sad and lonely” and less than fully human is something else. I do not believe in life after death and from all accounts the universe is unaware of our measly existence on this piece of rock on the outskirts of a single galaxy amongst millions (and that’s just in our neck of the woods!).
Amy apparently thinks this is a dead man walking position. I think not. To me, atheism signifies freedom and liberation. Life is much more important now because there is no second chance. If I screw this up, that’s it. I screwed up. I do not pass “go” and I do not collect 200 dollars.
Death is a lot more painful now. The conversation that my mother and I were having when she died? It’s not going to be continued someday and that is what made it and all the other conversations important and worth remembering. She’s not going to make cracks about how seriously I take things again.
My dad? He’s not out there somewhere having a beer, shooting skeets and ranting about politicians. He was taken down by cancer and he’s not coming back in this life or a supposed “next” life.
Immortality? It’s an insult to life and to death. And aye, it is arrogant. I’m no more special than my cats, the fly they executed this morning or any other non-human animal on the planet, past present or future.
We humans are not extra special. We die like everything else. And the universe does not notice our deaths any more than we notice the death of a mere ant. This isn’t sad, lonely and it doesn’t make me less than human. It makes me humble and it reminds me that life is important because it ends.
Remove death and you remove meaning from life. How can life have a bit of importance if death is not an option? To my way of thinking, it cannot have meaning. It becomes empty and unimportant.
I don’t kick puppies, torture cats or give babies dirty looks. I don’t hate the gods nor am I angry with them. I don’t worship Satan, Baal or any of the “bad” gods your religion supposes exists. I’m only angry when you, a theist, ticks me off with your ignorant arrogance.
I am an atheist.
This means I do not believe in any god, not just yours. That means your god is merely one of the thousands (millions?) of gods I do not believe exists. I consider them the creations of our collective ancestors and nothing more. If you thought about why you don’t believe in the rest of the gods, you might just figure out why I do not believe in yours.
I am not an atheist because I hate your god or because I am angry at it. I don’t believe your god exists. Hating it or being angry at it requires that I believe it exists. I have not confused your god and my father. I am not an atheist because I wish to live a moral free life or because some old person once looked at me funny.
I am an atheist because there’s not one shred of evidence that your god or the thousands that came before it exists outside of your holy books. While there are very specific reasons I do not like whatever religion you’ve aligned yourself to I am not an atheist because of them. Do not confuse the issue or tell me about the “true” version.
I am an atheist.
This word does not frighten me and I dont care what you think about it. I do not believe in the gods and I won’t choose a word you approve of to soften the blow.
I am an atheist.
I am not in a religion. I do not claim to be all knowing. I am not angry with your god or pretending it does not exist. I do not follow your evil god or have a secret faith in your not-evil god. I am not acknowledging your god when I address your religion anymore than you are denying your god when you address my disbelief.
I am an atheist.
Any Questions?
Here’s a great map to show the divide in the United States over abortion and what could potentially happen in a “Post-Roe” era:
Texas, the state I live in, is one of the ones most likely to make it worse for women seeking to terminate a pregnancy. I wish I could say I’m surprised, but I’m not. Northern Texas is a hotspot of sorts for the anti-reproductive freedom types.
H/T to The Atheist Mama
Blogged with Flock
I just downloaded and installed the beta version of Flock. One of the features is the ability to blog directly from the browser. So, if this works, you should be able to click here and read about a guy who thought God would save him from a lioness. It didn’t.
Here goes…
Update:
The post went through obviously. If you’ve got a blog, you should check Flock out. It looks somewhat like Firefox witht the only apparent (to me) difference being the ability to blog something directly from it.
Once you get it set up with your blog info all you have to do is right click and select ‘blog this’. A little word-like window pops up, you type whatever you want, spell check it and click on publish. Another screen pops up with your categories (if you’ve got them) and if you don’t you can type in tags for technorati.
It’s still in beta version and I wouldn’t advise installing any extensions just yet. I tried that and it messed up the display of a site I was looking at.
Much ado is being made about Ann Coulter’s remarks about 9/11 widows with people such as Hilary Clinton falling over herself to condemn them. Now, technically I think Ann had a bit of a point (political parties hiding behind untouchables, such as the Republicans accusing anyone who disagrees with the war of not ‘supporting the troops’), but there’s something else that’s more interesting.
Nothing is being made of the fact that her book is little more than an anti-atheist tirade. The title itself is an insult and harkens back to the days when it was the Christians being called godless by their Roman neighbours.
From page two of the tirade:
Their belief system is taught as fact in government schools, while the biblical belief system is banned from government schools by law. As a matter of faith, liberals believe: Darwinism is a fact, people are born gay, recycling is a virtue and chastity is not. If people are born gay, why hasn’t Darwinism weeded out people who don’t reproduce? (For that, we need a theory of survival of the most fabulous.) And if gays can’t change, why do liberals think child-molesters can?
I think it says something about how ingrained and acceptable anti-atheist bias is when the best insult a political hack can come up with is “Godless†and no one calls her out on her bigotry. What if she had titled her book “Nigger: The Colour of Liberalism†or some other such rubbish? What would the reviews be like then?
And if such a title pissed me off, would people be telling me that I should be a good little brown person so that the white people who think I’m a nigger will someday see the error of their ways?
I think not.
Using Children as “God’s Army” by Kirsten Powers on a movie about Jesus Camp, a right wing children’s camp where the leader wants children as young as five to be as serious about Christianity here as they are in Pakinstan:
“I want young people to be as committed to laying down their lives for the Gospel as they are in Pakistan.”
The Atheist Ethicist writes about how preparing for the worst thing that could happen is the best and perhaps only rational solution.
Here’s a link about some of God’s Greatest Mistakes in the (not so) ID Department. My favorite:
The Human Spine
Bipedal vertebrates usually carry much of the spine roughly horizontally, and balance it with a tail. Equally, a string of cotton reels with spongy cushions between is a good cantilever bridge type design for flexible quadrupedal running. But it’s a lousy thing to stand on its end and withstand the compression strains of vertical bipedalism. Compression strains are best absorbed by pillars. If you want the pillars to be flexible, you put joints in them. In biology, we have examples called ‘legs’.
And why thread so important a feature as the spinal cord through the middle of this, where disc damage can cause anything from pain to paralysis?
The spine’s ‘design’ thus results in back pain which causes over 149 million annual days off work in the U.S. alone, costing $50 to $100 billion in lost wages and medical costs, 80% of people being affected by back pain at some point in their lives, backache during pregnancy (extra weight pulling in an out-and-down direction it can’t happily support), and why you find, if you’ve ever ‘slipped’ (herniated) a disc, that about the only comfortable position is on all fours.
Cult expert Rick Ross wonder’s if President Bush will pay off ‘cult’ leader Rev Moon with a pardon in thanks for the $1 million the reverand donated to the Bush Library.